1st Gen Protege/323/GLC General/Maintenance Discussion for 1990-1994 Models (BG Chassis) and 1981-1989 GLC/323 Models (BD and BF chassis)

Air Intake Hose Question?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June-24th-2003 | 07:51 PM
  #1  
323DX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8
From: Australia
323DX is on a distinguished road
Air Intake Hose Question?????

Hey guys,

Im upgrading my 90' 323 BP SOHC and need some information. I'm currently making an air intake tube out of aluminium to replace the standard rubber one with the resonance chamber. The tube will connect straight from the throttle body to the VAF sensor and this way I can get rid of the ugly resonance chamber as well.

The question is can anyone tell me what the reducer on the standard intake hose is designed to do? Ive been told that it is used to quiten the intake noise but im not sure.

Any help would be most appreciated.
Thanks
Old June-24th-2003 | 09:26 PM
  #2  
mazdaspeedwest's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,367
From: Huntington Beach, CA Uhhh Surfs up Dude
mazdaspeedwest is on a distinguished road
by removing the Hbox you will also lose about 2-4ft.lbs of torque....

not sure what you mean by the reducer though....the stock air box has a few silencer chambers as well as that long thing just above the radiator. All that comes out when you remove the stock air box.
Old June-24th-2003 | 09:51 PM
  #3  
323DX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8
From: Australia
323DX is on a distinguished road
By removing the resonator box is that loss of torque really all that noticeable?

The reducer is on the stock intake tube. As the tube comes off the resonator box the tube looks as though it goes narrower then fattens up again.
Old June-25th-2003 | 03:26 AM
  #4  
demoninvictus's Avatar
Smoking or Non-Smoking???
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 731
From: Philly
demoninvictus is on a distinguished road
basically, if you're used to flooring it, something so small is very noticeable on the low end. keep the resonator intact
peace
Old June-25th-2003 | 05:31 PM
  #5  
ltcpablo16's Avatar
Protege Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5
ltcpablo16 is on a distinguished road
Here's a question. I have heard the reference to the resonance and H-box many times, but don't know what they are. Which is the long thingy attatched to the airbox, and which is the boxy thingamabobber on the flexible intake pipe between throttle body and VAF?
Old June-25th-2003 | 09:30 PM
  #6  
mazdaspeedwest's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,367
From: Huntington Beach, CA Uhhh Surfs up Dude
mazdaspeedwest is on a distinguished road
the hbox (directly behind the VAF attached to the rubber stock tube, regulates the air pulses into the intake. Which makes for better velocity and a better air/fuel mix.

the long tube above the radiator, is i believe used for 2 things, 1, a silencer to quiet the intake noise and to heat the air, why it heats the air, i have no idea which hurts performance.

but all in all, you'll have more torque (low end) with the stock air box fully intact than with a cone filter. So if you do mainly street driving low end is a good thing. If your foot is nailed to the floor constantly or you drag race, it won't matter much as the gains from an intake tube and cone filter will benefit more on the top end.

I tested my intakes with and without the hobx. I did notice better "out of corner" umph with the hbox. Merely a seat of the pants dyno test, but it did help.
Old June-26th-2003 | 12:52 AM
  #7  
kagekun's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 151
From: Grand Forks ND
kagekun is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by mazdaspeedwest
the hbox (directly behind the VAF attached to the rubber stock tube, regulates the air pulses into the intake. Which makes for better velocity and a better air/fuel mix.

the long tube above the radiator, is i believe used for 2 things, 1, a silencer to quiet the intake noise and to heat the air, why it heats the air, i have no idea which hurts performance.

but all in all, you'll have more torque (low end) with the stock air box fully intact than with a cone filter. So if you do mainly street driving low end is a good thing. If your foot is nailed to the floor constantly or you drag race, it won't matter much as the gains from an intake tube and cone filter will benefit more on the top end.

I tested my intakes with and without the hobx. I did notice better "out of corner" umph with the hbox. Merely a seat of the pants dyno test, but it did help.
Yea i can vouch on the torque part. There was a car show last weekend here and i "borrowed" there dyno for a couple of hours. The stock airbox is better then a cone filter on the low end, the gains on the top end were there but it wasnt much. I would imagine if your autocrossing and or just racing around town/city, its a much better option to stay with the airbox. Before i get called for bs, i couldnt bring my webcam to there dyno since its connected to my puter, i encourage you to do your on test if you boubt me.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sk-c
Mazda Service Info
0
June-27th-2009 02:23 AM
MazPro99
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
2
November-20th-2003 11:23 PM
DeaDLy93PRoTeGe
Parts For Sale or Wanted
3
April-27th-2003 11:25 PM
Stitch-em-up
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
10
April-13th-2003 04:32 PM
eek4ever
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
1
March-18th-2003 07:34 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 PM.