3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain Engine/Drivetrain Modification Discussions for 1999-2003 Models Only (BJ chassis)

Dyno: cams, exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old April-25th-2002 | 11:24 PM
  #31  
Eric F's Avatar
Protege God
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,525
From: Evanston, IL
Eric F is on a distinguished road
Where? I don't remember seeing it anywhere before. I should have known you'd find something like it though. I give you plenty of props for completing the FS-ZE swap. Why haven't you gotten the Unichip? It seems like the perfect solution to your ECU issue with the FS-ZE. It can control the the VRIS intake soleniod, remove the rev limiter, and tune the engine for maximum output. What else could you want?
Old April-26th-2002 | 12:04 AM
  #32  
Traveler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 453
From: Spokane WA
Traveler is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by njaremka
very strong indeed! the only thing i don't like about this engine is that the torque drops more than 15 ft-lbs between 4500 rpm and 6000 rpm. (and the redline is at 6500 rpm!) if there was any thing i could change about this engine it would be this: to make the torque stay above 100 ft-lbs. (at the wheels through-out the rev range) if this were the case, the power at the wheels would be close to 120 hp! (not the 105 as seen)
That's a pretty good plot! Torque will always decrease after 5252 RPM on any engine. In order to keep it over 100 Lb/ft at 6000 it would have to be making about 130 at peak. The best way to accomplish this is of course forced induction! A supercharger would keep it over 150 through the entire rev range probably!

As for the price, they checked with Dastek and yes it's $595 to me. I don't know what they pay. It will take about an hour of dyno time to set it up at $120/hr for tuning. It's $75 to run it 3 times with minor changes, and $120/hr if they are tuning and tweaking it themselves. They're pretty sure that it will only take about an hour of tuning and about an hour of installation at $55/hr. So I'd be looking at about a $800 bill by the time it's done. The MP3 comp is about a $1000 and doesn't offer any kind of tuning possibilities so this looks to be the cheapest route. You can use one of the outputs to run an additional injector so it won't be obsolete if I go the turbo or supercharger route later on.
Old April-26th-2002 | 01:25 AM
  #33  
markmurray77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 494
From: Toronto
markmurray77 is on a distinguished road
Can't wait to see what the exhuast does for ya.
Old April-26th-2002 | 08:04 AM
  #34  
njaremka's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,241
From: Central New York
njaremka is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by Traveler


That's a pretty good plot! Torque will always decrease after 5252 RPM on any engine. In order to keep it over 100 Lb/ft at 6000 it would have to be making about 130 at peak.
this is my point exactly!

Originally posted by Traveler


The best way to accomplish this is of course forced induction! A supercharger would keep it over 150 through the entire rev range probably!
however i disagree with this point. you can accomplish 130+ peak hp with out an SC or TC, it will just take some thoughtful tuning. i float around at the miata.net forum quite often, since i hope to have one soon. there is a guy over there that has done some carefule tuning of his miata to get 150+ STREETABLE hp out of his 1.6 motor with out going foced induction. that's the kind of power i'd like to see some one do with his (or her) protege.
Old April-26th-2002 | 04:12 PM
  #35  
Eric F's Avatar
Protege God
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,525
From: Evanston, IL
Eric F is on a distinguished road
Why do you say that? Not all engines are the same, so what is magical about 5252 RPM? Did you all read my post with the quote from Dastek about dynos? Very interesting reading about the different types of dynos, and the validity of the numbers you get from them. Also an excellent explaination of the diffence between HP and torque. Recommending reading. Dispells many common misconceptions about dyno curves, and HP and torque relationships.


Originally posted by Traveler


That's a pretty good plot! Torque will always decrease after 5252 RPM on any engine.
Old April-26th-2002 | 04:20 PM
  #36  
njaremka's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,241
From: Central New York
njaremka is on a distinguished road
the only thing really special about 5252 rpm is that is where the torque and hp equal each other on ALL engines.
Old April-26th-2002 | 04:27 PM
  #37  
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
Cripple Fight!!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,944
From: Northern VA
ZoomZoomH is on a distinguished road
ah, the eternal question about torque and horsepower

this page does a really good job explaining the relationship between the 2 mathematically, you'll see why 5252 is the magic number:

http://www.revsearch.com/dynamometer...orsepower.html
Old April-26th-2002 | 05:58 PM
  #38  
Traveler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 453
From: Spokane WA
Traveler is on a distinguished road
Thanks ZoomZoom. That answer your question Eric?
Old April-26th-2002 | 06:00 PM
  #39  
Traveler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 453
From: Spokane WA
Traveler is on a distinguished road
Just found out the exhaust cam won't ship until Monday. Found out they had a 'Sport 20 Familia' emblem in stock so I had them roll that into the order also. I figured it was only another $7.20.
Old April-27th-2002 | 12:04 PM
  #40  
eeterp's Avatar
Half-assed sport 20
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 564
From: Greenbelt, MD
eeterp is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by Eric F
Where? I don't remember seeing it anywhere before. I should have known you'd find something like it though. I give you plenty of props for completing the FS-ZE swap. Why haven't you gotten the Unichip? It seems like the perfect solution to your ECU issue with the FS-ZE. It can control the the VRIS intake soleniod, remove the rev limiter, and tune the engine for maximum output. What else could you want?
I swear I've mentioned the unichip before. Can't seem to find it using 'search' however. Anyway, I was just giving you a hard time.

I found out about unichip on the net. I read about a few hyundai tiburons that had one. Then I saw that tons of cars were using it. Some completely stock MR2 spyders (the new ones) were gaining 7whp, which sold me on the tuning ability. My local shop (Altered Atmosphere) just put one on a C70 Volvo.

As soon as I can get some headers, I'm going to have the headers, exhaust cam, and unichip installed all at once. The headers are delaying the whole process. I can't wait to post a dyno sheet!

I'm interested to know how to control the VICS system. I know the unichip can do it but, don't know how to input data into the solenoid. Anyone know anything about this?
Old April-27th-2002 | 05:34 PM
  #41  
Eric F's Avatar
Protege God
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,525
From: Evanston, IL
Eric F is on a distinguished road
I believe you, it was just the first I remember hearing of it. Unlike Jesse, I can't get to every post on the Forum. After reading this months SCC issue, I'm concerned about when the Mazda ECU goes into open loop mode though. Since the Unichip only excepts two inputs, RPM and throttle position/load, the stock ECU may be able to undue any tuning attempts in closed loop mode. The VICS system is controlled by an electrical signal generated from the ECU at a specific RPM. That signal triggers a soleniod which opens a valve that lets vacuum open the throttle plates in the secondary runners in the intake manifold. The Unichip can intercept the original ECU signal, and generate it's own at a programmable RPM point.



Originally posted by eeterp


I swear I've mentioned the unichip before. Can't seem to find it using 'search' however. Anyway, I was just giving you a hard time.

I found out about unichip on the net. I read about a few hyundai tiburons that had one. Then I saw that tons of cars were using it. Some completely stock MR2 spyders (the new ones) were gaining 7whp, which sold me on the tuning ability. My local shop (Altered Atmosphere) just put one on a C70 Volvo.

As soon as I can get some headers, I'm going to have the headers, exhaust cam, and unichip installed all at once. The headers are delaying the whole process. I can't wait to post a dyno sheet!

I'm interested to know how to control the VICS system. I know the unichip can do it but, don't know how to input data into the solenoid. Anyone know anything about this?
Old April-27th-2002 | 05:51 PM
  #42  
Eric F's Avatar
Protege God
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,525
From: Evanston, IL
Eric F is on a distinguished road
Yes, 5252 RPM is where HP and torque intesect on a graph. HP is always lower than torque below that RPM, and higher than torque above that RPM. That's not the same as Torque always declines after 5252 rpm. Good link though, thanks.
Jesse, did you go to the site I posted and read the rest of the inforamation about dynos? The premise was that torque as measured at the wheels by a loading dynomometer isn't accurate because of driveline losses. It's explained better here:
http://www.dastek.co.za/ click on 'Dastek Dynomometers' and 'Introduction to Dynomometers'.



Originally posted by Traveler
Thanks ZoomZoom. That answer your question Eric?
Old April-27th-2002 | 10:58 PM
  #43  
Traveler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 453
From: Spokane WA
Traveler is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
Traveler, torque doesnt always fall after 5252rpm, it simply will be LESS than hp at the same rpm. I included a dyno chart to show this.



From Eric's post....."If we take two similar cars with only slightly different profile tyres and run them on a chassis dynamometer we should see that the power is very similar whilst the torque will be radically different."

This is just WRONG

Torque and Hp is mathmatically related by the formula already given in this thread. Therefore, you cannot change one and not have it affect the other. Therefore, if you have 2 engines with 85hp at 3000 rpm, they will BOTH have X lb-ft of torque at 3000rpm, no matter what. Its simply a defiinition.
You used a dyno chart from a vortech supercharged honda, so the torque is not going to decrease much after 5252. On almost every normally aspirated engine I've seen the dyno plot for, torque will decrease after the crossing point. The reason it doesn't on supercharged/turbocharged/nitrous engines is because you are putting more than one atmosphere of O2 into the cylinder. The rules of thumb are different for boosted engines. Still, our cars have a pretty flat torque curve and aren't bad for 2.0 liters.
Old April-28th-2002 | 04:44 AM
  #44  
DanMan's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 71
DanMan is on a distinguished road
Supercharger

Are there any Supercharges made to fit the 3rd Gen engines?
Old April-28th-2002 | 08:53 PM
  #45  
StuttersC's Avatar
That's me!!
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 337
From: Denver, CO
StuttersC is on a distinguished road
I thought horspower was derived from the torque readings that a dyno meter measured. Then the computer attached to then dyno simply plotted the curve for the torque and the numbers it derives from the equation for horsepower and plotted that.

Then again, I've had a bad day and I might be wrong.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 PM.