3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain Engine/Drivetrain Modification Discussions for 1999-2003 Models Only (BJ chassis)

extra resonator on a catback exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old September-15th-2003 | 01:18 AM
  #1  
jjac28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 146
From: toronto,canada
jjac28 is on a distinguished road
Question extra resonator on a catback exhaust

I got a custom designed catback exhaust installed a week ago.
i noticed that above 70mph there was a droning sound coming from the exhaust and it got really annoying on the highway.

i had to take my car back as it was just too laud .
i'm looking for a quiet ride but with performance gains.
so to make it more quieter they installed an extra resonator....
so i'm curious now , will an extra resonator decrease my hp gain and torque?

Last edited by jjac28; September-15th-2003 at 01:26 AM.
Old September-16th-2003 | 06:22 PM
  #2  
user 11897647645's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,111
user 11897647645 is on a distinguished road
The resonator will not be optimal for performance, seeing as how the pipe expands then decreases in size (not uniform, hurts scavenging). I honestly don't think it will make much of a difference in output for our vehicles though.
Old September-16th-2003 | 06:34 PM
  #3  
jjac28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 146
From: toronto,canada
jjac28 is on a distinguished road
well, having a catback definately helps a lot in performance
Old September-16th-2003 | 09:04 PM
  #4  
user 11897647645's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,111
user 11897647645 is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by jjac28
well, having a catback definately helps a lot in performance
I'm going to play devil's advocate here for a second and disagree. The pipe has to be an ideal size for performance. Say the pipe is 3.0 inches in diameter? That would actually hurt performance in a small displacement NA motor like we have. Or if the pipe was too small, then it couldn't breathe. Am I making any sense?
Old September-17th-2003 | 11:51 AM
  #5  
jjac28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 146
From: toronto,canada
jjac28 is on a distinguished road
i can tell you that i feel the difference, the car seems quicker, better throttle response, that "jerking" is gone in lower rpms and it has better passing power on the highway .
so theres definately improvement over the stock.
the catback i have is from brullen...yeah, it's true that a 3' pipe is not good for our cars...you loose lower end torque...
u see , i was told that the resonator will not effect the performance but i'm trying to see if anyone would know for sure...

Last edited by jjac28; September-17th-2003 at 03:53 PM.
Old September-17th-2003 | 03:32 PM
  #6  
turbonium959's Avatar
Oil Change Enthusiast
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,587
From: Norwood, MA
turbonium959 is on a distinguished road
I am not too sure of this, but of all the resonators I have seen on stock ehaust systmes (I used to work for Monro Muffler & Brake), the resonator is always larger in diameter then the pipe. I would assume that all it does, is disturbs the flow of the sound waves traveling down the pipes. As for disturbing the flow of gasses themselves, I would assume that there is some, but not large enough to be noticed.
This is a little quote from Autozone.com:
"resonator: A small auxiliary muffler, after the main muffler, used to help reduce engine noise without restricting the flow of exhaust gas."

So I guess you are OK to have a resonator! Goodluck.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
acottin
Mazda3/Mazdaspeed3
1
June-22nd-2008 01:54 PM
jroman213
3rd Gen Protege/MazdaSpeed/P5/MP3
2
February-13th-2004 12:59 AM
MrPacSun
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
16
December-15th-2003 03:45 PM
Neb
Parts For Sale or Wanted
0
April-20th-2003 03:56 PM
Redw0rm
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
3
March-16th-2003 06:10 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 PM.