3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain Engine/Drivetrain Modification Discussions for 1999-2003 Models Only (BJ chassis)

FS-DET swap coming soon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old April-30th-2003 | 08:44 AM
  #16  
JustMe's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 107
From: Estonia
JustMe is on a distinguished road
As I have understood , then 1.8 engine is better for Turbo cause for its shorter rods.

Second, tranny with 1.8 is also better, at least is seems that way cause many of the 2.0 trannys have been broken. At least Espec 1.8 and tranny for that engine are better than 2.0 and its engine. Trannys are the same as USpec.

And if you want the best for your money, then i would suggest that youl change the rods and pistons for stronger ones and maeby SpoolTurbo kit with 8 injectors and stand alone. Then i think you would have pretty good kit of everything.

Just my suggestion, which may not be the truth

Good luck!
Old April-30th-2003 | 12:11 PM
  #17  
JustMe's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 107
From: Estonia
JustMe is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX


Longer rods are better.

Please read the link I posted in this thread
Effects of Short Rods
Pro:
» Provides very good intake and exhaust velocities at low to moderate engine speeds causing the engine to produce good low end torque, mostly due to the higher vacuum at the beginning of the intake cycle. High intake velocities also create a more homogenous (uniform) air/fuel mixture within the combustion chamber. This will produce greater power output due to this effect.
» The increase in piston speed away from TDC on the power stroke causes the chamber volume to increase more rapidly than in a long-rod motor - this delays the point of maximum cylinder pressure for best effect with supercharger or turbo boost and/or nitrous oxide.
-----------------------------------------------------

Im not sure if I understood it correctly but atleast I feel like I did
Old April-30th-2003 | 03:24 PM
  #18  
PinkMX-3's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 87
From: Gainesville, FL
PinkMX-3 is on a distinguished road
Why spend several thousand dollars on a crappy truck motor with a tiny turbo when you can get an FE3 for under a grand and turbo it with a stand alone for under 5k? Do you want to have an inferior and slow car? :shrug:
Old April-30th-2003 | 05:14 PM
  #19  
redrims's Avatar
Protege Progasm
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,456
From: MD
redrims is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by PinkMX-3
Why spend several thousand dollars on a crappy truck motor with a tiny turbo when you can get an FE3 for under a grand and turbo it with a stand alone for under 5k? Do you want to have an inferior and slow car? :shrug:
Because that will be way too expensive to modify in a pro. I was thinking about this earlier this year, but I think it's too much trouble to go through. Well, unless he has the money for it.
Old April-30th-2003 | 08:13 PM
  #20  
TheMAN's Avatar
Protege Anarchist
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 708
From: Dallas, TX
TheMAN is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by P2K


Son? Whatever man. I don't need money from my parents. I make my own money unlike yourself buddy.
And what makes you think I have money coming from my parents?


I'm just trying to do a swap, simple as that. All I wanted to know is which is the best way to go and now I know, son.
That's nice. Maybe you won't get ripped $8000 out of your *** if you have actually RESEARCHED AND LEARNED.


1 - I'm keeping my car
Go you.

2 - An engine out of a wreck is probably screwed in some way
Yeah, whatever

3 - I'm not trading my car in for a civic

But thanks for trying to help.



It's not that I have money to burn, I just get estimates for something and shoot for that goal. If I'm commited enough (which I am), I reach it 9 times out of 10. I'm just doing a swap, changing from FWD to RWD is way too much work and not even worth it, but thanks for the suggestion.
You sure know how to find places for estimates

I'm doing the 2.0L swap with either the FM or Tri-point turbo. I should have it in by the end of the year. Hopefully Before September, just in time for NOPI.
Good luck
Old May-1st-2003 | 12:09 AM
  #21  
carguycw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,122
From: Dallas, Texas
carguycw is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by JustMe
Effects of Short Rods
Pro:
» The increase in piston speed away from TDC on the power stroke causes the chamber volume to increase more rapidly than in a long-rod motor - this delays the point of maximum cylinder pressure for best effect with supercharger or turbo boost and/or nitrous oxide.
-----------------------------------------------------

Im not sure if I understood it correctly but atleast I feel like I did
Yes, but you missed something else... the 1.8L has LONGER rods. If two engines have the same deck height (distance between the crank centerline and top of the block) and the same piston pin height, the engine with a shorter stroke must have longer rods and vice versa.

To put it another way, the distance from the crank to the piston pin is the sum of the stroke and the rod length. If the total distance remains constant, to lengthen one you must shorten the other.

BTW I don't want to turn this into another discussion of the effects of bore to stroke and rod to stroke ratio, but the FS-DE is a very undersquare engine with a poor rod-to-stroke ratio. From a performance standpoint, it's a lot closer to the point of diminishing returns than the FP-DE.

One other thing...

Originally posted by JustMe
Second, tranny with 1.8 is also better, at least is seems that way cause many of the 2.0 trannys have been broken.
No, it's not. The G-series tranny in the 2.0L cars is capable of handling more punishment than the F-series that comes with the 1.8L, and just about everyone who's familiar with high-performance FWD Mazdas knows this. It is a stouter unit in just about every way. I blame the increased 'Net reports of 2.0L tranny breakage on three factors...

1) The 2.0L engines have more torque than a 1.8L, and TORQUE breaks trannies, not power. FYI, both Mazda FWD tranny families (the F and the G) have a reputation for being somewhat fragile compared to other companies' products.

2) A LOT more people are hot-rodding the 2.0L cars than the 1.8L cars. Take a look at the vehicles owned by most people on this list if you need proof.

3) Many of the people buying the 2.0L cars are young folks without a whole lot of experience driving a manual-tranny car hard. I don't mean to overgeneralize here, but let's face it- the 99-00 1.8L Proteges were one of the best-kept secrets of the sporty sedan market, and were mostly ignored by younger, trend-driven enthusiasts, who have mostly hopped on board after the MP3, P5 and MSP came out.

Also, before you make too many assumptions about the strength of the 1.8L tranny, I suggest you read this thread and this thread.
Old May-1st-2003 | 06:43 PM
  #22  
purePro5's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 151
From: "Hotlanta"
purePro5 is on a distinguished road
What about a Japanese BP-T(I think that is what it is called). Will it fit in a protege? If so, I have a buddy in atlanta that will import one for you with ECU and transmission, fuel pump, injectors, etc. for around $1600. That would be a worthwhile swap if it is possible.
Old May-1st-2003 | 08:32 PM
  #23  
glowck's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 152
From: Central Maryland
glowck is on a distinguished road
BP Turbo. Look at Corksports Drag Protege you can see with some modifacations it can fit in there. $$$$$$$Can you say it
Old May-2nd-2003 | 01:57 AM
  #24  
Maxx Mazda's Avatar
I am TEH W1N!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,076
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Maxx Mazda is on a distinguished road
Old May-2nd-2003 | 10:50 AM
  #25  
Maxx Mazda's Avatar
I am TEH W1N!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,076
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Maxx Mazda is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX


Let's not.

Let's all to try to keep our mouth shut unless we have something interesting to say.
I totally agree. I just posted that to hint at possible "things to come."
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UrBaNsTyLe55
Parts For Sale or Wanted
2
March-5th-2004 05:31 PM
1fatEs
Photo and Video Gallery
5
July-24th-2002 09:39 AM
YellowPR5
General Automotive
0
April-11th-2002 01:02 PM
Sir Nuke
Lower MidWest
26
March-10th-2002 01:03 AM
biknman
Photo and Video Gallery
10
March-9th-2002 03:14 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.