3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain Engine/Drivetrain Modification Discussions for 1999-2003 Models Only (BJ chassis)

Injen Racing Division CAI Dyno Results for 1.8L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May-17th-2002 | 01:37 AM
  #1  
jstand6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Passion for Zoom Zoom!
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 372
From: San Diego, CA
jstand6 is on a distinguished road
Injen Racing Division CAI Dyno Results for 1.8L

Hey all,

I volunteered my '99 ES to have a prototype Injen Racing Division Cold Air Intake installed and tested on my car. I also got to keep the intake and they provided a rental car! Thanks Injen!!

They put the car on a dyno and the results are quite different than the one's posted for the AEM intake.

Horsepower at the wheels (stock): 102.8
Horsepower at the wheels (Injen): 107.8

Torque at the wheels (stock): 105.0
Torque at the wheels (Injen): 111.2

I was very impressed with the results. The power increases are all throughout the rpm range, not criss-crossing like some intakes. There is quite a noticeable difference behind the wheel. Yes, there is a bit more pull from the engine, but throttle response is instant now. The engine seems so much happier now. It pulls hard right up to redline and I have to adjust my shifting sooner before redline because it hits the limiter quicker now.

I have also noticed a decent gain in fuel mileage (it was a couple hours drive to the shop). Also, during idle and cruise, engine noise and drone is practically nonexistant. Driving at 80mph is no longer agony.

The sound from this intake is amazing. A low, powerful whoosh under mid to hard acceleration. It has already turned heads from other modded cars on the road. The system looks terrific- polished with bright red connectors.

Even though I didn't pay for the system, I think it's a great deal. Sure, the power increase isn't huge, but the increased response, better mileage, quieter cruise, and terrific sound is an added bonus.

Here are the results, and pics of the old stock intake and new intake installed.






Can you believe the air had to pass through all that!!

-Jerry

Last edited by jstand6; May-17th-2002 at 02:03 AM.
Old May-17th-2002 | 01:41 AM
  #2  
SedanMan's Avatar
Mr. Butlertron
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 414
From: Montreal, QC
SedanMan is on a distinguished road
People with 2 liter engine who have dynoed their cars have 98-102 hp at the wheels. Wouldnt it make sense that the 1.8 liter which has a smaller displacement and is the older engine have less hp? Am I missing something?
Old May-17th-2002 | 01:43 AM
  #3  
protetype's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,667
From: Centennial, Colorado
protetype is on a distinguished road
right on... thanks for posting the dyno charts. i'm glad someone from the board was able to get in on that testing for the prototype. :] good job on gettin in there and helpin em make another product for the protege's, and good score on the free intake
Old May-17th-2002 | 02:17 AM
  #4  
jstand6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Passion for Zoom Zoom!
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 372
From: San Diego, CA
jstand6 is on a distinguished road
People with 2 liter engine who have dynoed their cars have 98-102 hp at the wheels. Wouldnt it make sense that the 1.8 liter which has a smaller displacement and is the older engine have less hp? Am I missing something?
I don't know. I considered upgrading to the 2.0L. But, when I test drove the car, I found sluggish compared to my 1.8L. I know that 2001+ Protege sedans are heavier, but they also have more power. The '99s posted the best 0-60 times I've seen in the magazines (8.4 seconds, November 1998 Car and Driver). Typically, I see 8.9 seconds 0-60 for the 2.0L.

Maybe there's something we're all missing. Perhaps the larger wheels and brakes on the 2.0L's? I was surprised when I saw the results, but they match my experience with the cars (I sold Mazda's up until a year ago). However, Injen said a 15% reduction in power from the crank to wheels is typical for a 5-spd manual FWD tranny. Take away 15% from the 120hp crank rating of the 1.8L and you get 102hp. Almost spot on...

BTW, they told me that the Subaru WRX's AWD drivetrain is highly inefficient. They only produce 170hp at the wheels... that's a 57 hp decrease (25%)!

-Jerry
Old May-17th-2002 | 02:59 AM
  #5  
StuttersC's Avatar
That's me!!
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 337
From: Denver, CO
StuttersC is on a distinguished road
Can't see the pics. All it says is "Your are trying tot access an image outside of imagestation.com."

No pics...
Old May-17th-2002 | 07:17 AM
  #6  
StuttersC's Avatar
That's me!!
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 337
From: Denver, CO
StuttersC is on a distinguished road
Thanks...Looks nice.

I'm kind of confused though, didn't Injen already have an intake for this car, or did they just want to dyno it??
Old May-17th-2002 | 08:56 AM
  #7  
Raptor's Avatar
Black Tornado hehehe :D
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 219
From: Hull, Qc
Raptor is on a distinguished road
Injen did not have an intake for the 1.8L yet. This is the test bench one. Looks nice btw.

Raptor
Old May-17th-2002 | 10:46 AM
  #8  
Pro_fan's Avatar
Bruce Leroy
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 788
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Pro_fan is on a distinguished road
Question Raptor-question

Hey Raptor,
This is kind of on topic/off topic...
I noticed in your signature that you've got an AEM short ram intake. I was curious how much you paid (if you don't mind my asking)? I just checked at a local place here and they want $343 for the AEM short ram!

Jerry,
I am totally jealous! Enjoy your CAI!! Did they say how much the Injen 1.8 L CAI would cost retail?
Old May-17th-2002 | 11:25 AM
  #9  
eeterp's Avatar
Half-assed sport 20
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 564
From: Greenbelt, MD
eeterp is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by jstand6

BTW, they told me that the Subaru WRX's AWD drivetrain is highly inefficient. They only produce 170hp at the wheels... that's a 57 hp decrease (25%)!

-Jerry

actually, 25% isn't bad. most AWD drivetrains lose 25-29%


congrats on the injen intake. nice gains.
Old May-17th-2002 | 11:32 AM
  #10  
carguycw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,122
From: Dallas, Texas
carguycw is on a distinguished road
Does the Injen intake use a foam filter, paper filter or a washable K&N-type cotton gauze filter?

Nice gains, but I don't trust foam filters and I love washable, reusable filters. Also, how much will the Injen intake cost?
Old May-17th-2002 | 11:36 AM
  #11  
white-p5's Avatar
Protege Newbie
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 28
From: Ottawa, Ontario
white-p5 is on a distinguished road
Nice post.

I would also be interested in some retail prices for the Injeg CAI.
Old May-17th-2002 | 12:19 PM
  #12  
Sir Nuke's Avatar
Master of All Things :{D
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,118
From: southeast texas, near houston
Sir Nuke is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by carguycw
Does the Injen intake use a foam filter, paper filter or a washable K&N-type cotton gauze filter?

Nice gains, but I don't trust foam filters and I love washable, reusable filters. Also, how much will the Injen intake cost?
it uses a washable K&N type cone filter.
Old May-17th-2002 | 12:25 PM
  #13  
jstand6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Passion for Zoom Zoom!
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 372
From: San Diego, CA
jstand6 is on a distinguished road
The Injen CAI for the 1.8L is almost exactly the same CAI for the 2.0L motors. I guess the price will be the same at $320 (ouch!). They are debating whether to put a different model number, or the same. They did say they had to mount the coolant resevoir and a wiring/vacuum hose bracket in different places compared to the 2.0L.

I am not sure what the filter is made from (it is hidden in the bumper/wheel well area). Looking from the pics on Injen's website, it appears to be a cotton gauze (or like material) sandwiched between steel mesh. According in Injen, their filters outperform every other filter out there and they back it up with a test performed by Jackson Racing.

I have to check Injen's brochure for more information. I may have one in the car, but I definitely have one on my desk at home. I'll run down and check in a bit and I'll post anything I find.

Here's a cutaway pic of the filter:



-Jerry
Old May-17th-2002 | 12:28 PM
  #14  
azrakain's Avatar
Patriotic Protege5
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 908
From: Hampton, VA
azrakain is on a distinguished road
I believe I saw some articles in SCC saying that the WRX drive train was even more inneficient than 25%. They dynoed it at like 155-160HP. That is terrible, but you got a lot more drivetrain bits there.
Old May-17th-2002 | 12:58 PM
  #15  
jstand6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Passion for Zoom Zoom!
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 372
From: San Diego, CA
jstand6 is on a distinguished road
I had an Injen brochure in the car. It wasn't really much help. It says they are cotton and utilize a four-ply design. They are designed and engineered by Injen though. The velocity stack they talk about is just a lip in the urethane rubber molding which fits over the edge of the tubing to increase airflow. They use urethane rubber because it distorts less than other rubbers.

Does anyone know a decent graphic hosting website out there? I was just linking pictures from my Yahoo! Protege Club photo folder, but they seem to change the addresses every couple of days. I moved to Sony's Imagestation last night and it worked last night. However, now it seems it doesn't. Anyone?

Here's a link to my album on imagestation. It has pics of my car, the dyno results, and the old and new intakes. I hope this works...

http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4291814421

-Jerry



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 AM.