whats the best?
#16
Tendo, 6 gallons of 93 octane + 1 gallon of 115octane Xylene (100% pure) = 7 gallons of 96.4octane.
7 gallons is about a half a tank so if you want less weight you could run 3 gallons of 93 + .5 gallon of Xylene. for the same 96 octane.
Never mix Xylene more than 6:1. It'll wash your cylinder walls. If you need anything higher than 96 octane you should just buy 100 octane race fuel from your local speed shop.
7 gallons is about a half a tank so if you want less weight you could run 3 gallons of 93 + .5 gallon of Xylene. for the same 96 octane.
Never mix Xylene more than 6:1. It'll wash your cylinder walls. If you need anything higher than 96 octane you should just buy 100 octane race fuel from your local speed shop.
#17
Originally posted by gcs118
Weird. Well if the car runs better on 87, it's better for you, the car, and your wallet. I wouldn't complain
Weird. Well if the car runs better on 87, it's better for you, the car, and your wallet. I wouldn't complain
#18
Octane is not a measure of a fuel's energy - fuel energy is measured in BTU. Octane is a measure of how quickly the fuel burns. The higher the octane, the slower the burn. You want a slower burn in cars with a higher compression ratio (or additional compression pressure as the result of a turbo or supercharger). The reason is, if the fuel burns too quickly, you'll get spontaneous combustion - commonly called "knock". Now, if your car has higher compression pressures than stock and you get knock, the knock sensor ( a piezo ceramic element) is going to sense the vibration and send an electrical signal to the ECU, which will retard spark timing, which will cost you power. But this will never happen if your car is stock, because it has been carefully calibrated by Mazda to have a wide margin against knock on 87 octane under full load conditions. Remember that running high octane fuel is really buying you additional margin against knock. If your Protege is essentially stock (or you haven't somehow increased in-cylinder pressures by shaving the head, adding higher compression pistons, or bolting on a turbo), you'll gain nothing by using a higher grade fuel. But if you order that Wagner turbo kit, better to invest in premium when you fill her up.
#20
And that's a good point that Roddimus makes. If you are using N2O, better go with higher octane fuel.
I was expecting that someone would correct me, and note that not all cars have knock sensors. This is true; and in such a case, there is nothing to detect knock and thus the ECU cannot compensate for it. But even if your car cannot detect knock, using the correct grade of fuel will prevent it.
Preventing knock from occurring is extremely important, because it causes in-cylinder temperatures to rise, which can lead to pre-ignition. Pre-ignition is ignition that occurs from a hot spot (such as a red hot exhaust valve) and it occurs independent of the spark event. This can lead to melted pistons, etc.
I was expecting that someone would correct me, and note that not all cars have knock sensors. This is true; and in such a case, there is nothing to detect knock and thus the ECU cannot compensate for it. But even if your car cannot detect knock, using the correct grade of fuel will prevent it.
Preventing knock from occurring is extremely important, because it causes in-cylinder temperatures to rise, which can lead to pre-ignition. Pre-ignition is ignition that occurs from a hot spot (such as a red hot exhaust valve) and it occurs independent of the spark event. This can lead to melted pistons, etc.
#23
that doesnt JUST occur from hot spots...I hate it when people make all inclusive statements...actually you are more likely to get detonation from higher cylinder pressures on lower octane gas than a hot spot....higher octane gas resists detonation in these higher cylinder pressures,ie,turbo,N20,high compression pistons...
#25
Originally posted by macdaddyslomo I hate it when people make all inclusive statements.
Originally posted by juddz
Octane is a measure of how quickly the fuel burns.
Octane is a measure of how quickly the fuel burns.
"How quickly a fuel burns" is extremely vague. Typically "quick" is a term used to describe speed (scalar form of velocity), or a change in speed (acceleration). In which case, one measure would be Stoichiometric Flame Speed which is measured in m/s. I can see how you may be referring to the temperatures and pressures a fuel will autoignite, but using a term like "how quickly a fuel burns" is easily misleading.
You want a slower burn in cars with a higher compression ratio (or additional compression pressure as the result of a turbo or supercharger). The reason is, if the fuel burns too quickly, you'll get spontaneous combustion - commonly called "knock".
Pre-ignition (surface ignition) occurs just from hot spots. Knock (spontaneous combustion) is the result of combustion pressure. There is a distinction between the two...
juddz - I'm sorry if this post sounded like a flame. You have a lot of good information in your posts, but some of it was a bit misleading and I wanted to clear things up a bit.
Last edited by GNO; July-13th-2004 at 05:19 PM.
#29
Word of warning to everyone. I live in SD, and they're really big on the new Ethanol. It's put into the 89 fuel around here, don't put any of it into your cars. They say it harmless to all vehicles, but it's a bunch of bull. I've kept my P5 away from it, but my maxima accidently got some in it. And then spent hours and lots of money replacing my injectors. Even my local Mazda dealer expressed doubts over the fuel for my P5. So if you ever travel this direction, don't get the ethanol.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)