3rd Gen Protege/MazdaSpeed/P5/MP3 General/Maintenance Discussion for 1999-2003.5 Models Only (BJ Chassis)

Compression ration of MP3 is higher!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June-5th-2002 | 11:23 AM
  #1  
nick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 140
nick is on a distinguished road
Compression ration of MP3 is higher!

I was gathering information on the engine specs from Mazda, as I am going to turbocharge it.

Mazda mechanics told me the compression ration on the MP3 engine is 10.3 and not as low as the P5 engines or the sedans.

I was also told they were the ones who put the premium fuel sticker on the car. They told me, its a must that I use 93 octane.

Basically the P5 engine and sedans are better for turbo applications, being they are almost one full point lower compression ration.

I was a bit confused, so I called up Calloway and asked questions about the boost pressure and was the engine any different than a standard production unit used on P5, etc. They said yes, it has different bore and stroke! I was totally ******* amazed. The bore is smaller and the stroke is longer. The new numbers were 3.36 + 3.96 compared to 3.69 + 3.70.

The also said they didn't not change any internals.
Old June-5th-2002 | 12:46 PM
  #2  
nick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 140
nick is on a distinguished road
Never seen one with the head off. Why?

As far as those bore and stroke numbers, they may be off slighty, as I am going from memory, not writen down data, sorry about that. But they said the bore had to do with the compression being higher.

They told me nothing was done to the ECU, and Racing Beat said the same thing.
Old June-5th-2002 | 12:56 PM
  #3  
Tom Slick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 260
From: central coast calif.
Tom Slick is on a distinguished road
how do you change the bore and stroke without "changing any internals"? pistons and the crank are main components of the "internals"
i don't know how you make a block have a smaller bore, unless they sleeve it?
with custom pistons you could have a longer stroke with the clearance between the piston and head.

also just for future reference it is compression "ratio" not compression "ration"
Old June-5th-2002 | 01:19 PM
  #4  
kc5zom's Avatar
Certified Sick Individual
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,141
From: Houston, TX.
kc5zom is on a distinguished road
Yeah. I was pretty sure that the MP3 had some ECU changes. But they did something pretty serious to the internals if they changed the bore and stroke of the engine. Doing internal changes should have yielded a lot more than just 10hp.
Old June-5th-2002 | 01:38 PM
  #5  
stocker's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 323
From: Hamilton, ON
stocker is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by kc5zom
Yeah. I was pretty sure that the MP3 had some ECU changes. But they did something pretty serious to the internals if they changed the bore and stroke of the engine. Doing internal changes should have yielded a lot more than just 10hp.
I read his post as saying, Callaway did not change any internals when going turbo. P5 and MP3 internals would be different if bore and stroke are different.
Old June-5th-2002 | 01:54 PM
  #6  
nick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 140
nick is on a distinguished road
I was told by Calloway, that the MP3 engines are different, but use all factory parts, and are built like this from the factory
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JMAN
1st gen/323/GLC Suspension and Brakes
19
August-2nd-2003 02:58 AM
jtype
Exterior/Interior/Audio
5
June-29th-2003 12:34 PM
JustinMP3
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
21
February-11th-2003 02:51 PM
motorhead16v4
3rd gen Suspension/Brakes
9
October-12th-2002 02:22 AM
PJStyles
3rd Gen Protege/MazdaSpeed/P5/MP3
27
May-3rd-2002 09:29 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.