distance on one tank of gas
#19
Originally posted by Pampusik
according all infos , they have 55L tanks in USA, so The Man has advantage of 5L comparing to canadians - that is roughly in his case 60.5-65 km .
according all infos , they have 55L tanks in USA, so The Man has advantage of 5L comparing to canadians - that is roughly in his case 60.5-65 km .
#20
Originally posted by Pampusik
according all infos , they have 55L tanks in USA, so The Man has advantage of 5L comparing to canadians - that is roughly in his case 60.5-65 km .
according all infos , they have 55L tanks in USA, so The Man has advantage of 5L comparing to canadians - that is roughly in his case 60.5-65 km .
#21
I`v got year 1999, and according manual there is 50L tank for 1.6 and 1.8L engines. I did not mean that in general as I do not own each year, but even in this forum you can find that there are significant differences in canadian/american versions of Proteges.
#22
Originally posted by Pampusik
I`v got year 1999, and according manual there is 50L tank for 1.6 and 1.8L engines. I did not mean that in general as I do not own each year, but even in this forum you can find that there are significant differences in canadian/american versions of Proteges.
I`v got year 1999, and according manual there is 50L tank for 1.6 and 1.8L engines. I did not mean that in general as I do not own each year, but even in this forum you can find that there are significant differences in canadian/american versions of Proteges.
I love making people look stupid!
#23
Originally posted by Pampusik
I`v got year 1999, and according manual there is 50L tank for 1.6 and 1.8L engines. I did not mean that in general as I do not own each year, but even in this forum you can find that there are significant differences in canadian/american versions of Proteges.
I`v got year 1999, and according manual there is 50L tank for 1.6 and 1.8L engines. I did not mean that in general as I do not own each year, but even in this forum you can find that there are significant differences in canadian/american versions of Proteges.
I love making people look stupid!
#25
Originally posted by Pampusik
Yes , I was WRONG because I did not know about 2.0 L engines here in Canada ( I have 1.8 ).
By the way, I have never said that The Man has 50 L tank!!!
Pampusik
Yes , I was WRONG because I did not know about 2.0 L engines here in Canada ( I have 1.8 ).
By the way, I have never said that The Man has 50 L tank!!!
Pampusik
#27
Originally posted by Farsyde
400 mpg now. Turns out cuz of the dusty conditions in tallahassee, the air filter was getting choked. But before that i was only gettin around 270mpg
400 mpg now. Turns out cuz of the dusty conditions in tallahassee, the air filter was getting choked. But before that i was only gettin around 270mpg
I'm sorry but I couldn't help myself!