3rd Gen Protege/MazdaSpeed/P5/MP3 General/Maintenance Discussion for 1999-2003.5 Models Only (BJ Chassis)

made 2 more dyno pulls, and they are completely different from each other!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October-6th-2004 | 11:50 PM
  #1  
DonSVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 70
From: texas
DonSVO is on a distinguished road
made 2 more dyno pulls, and they are completely different from each other!

pull #1 was very similar to my 180 hp pull from last week. it peaked at 178.4 HP and 173 tq. the graph has a 'jump' about 4600ish RPM to 5000 RPM in which horsepower increases roughly 35ish. its like a 'step' in the power curve. nice arc, jump, arcs again. oh yes, the AF curve bottoms out then comes up to 12:1 then settles to 11.4-11.5. this would create the step.

now run #2 was completely different. peak HP was 174.8 and TQ was 188! the curve for HP was damn smooth up to about 5600 where it starts to jig-jag about 10ish HP to redline (spark breakup and an insanely low 11.4:1 AF ratio). AF ratio was a steady 11.5:1 without the sub-10 plunge. torque was also smooth and consistently was 15-20 lb/ft over my other run. BUT! the curve is linear and makes a nice arc, whereas all of my 178-180 hp pulls all exhibit lower torque/more peak HP/the 'jump' in the mid range.

i would like comments from others who have dynoed their MSPs: did you experience similar differences in your pulls? i want to know why my car sometimes yanks fuel and sometimes doesn't. also, read my other thread regarding developing a voltage limiter for creating boost over 10 PSI...
Old October-7th-2004 | 10:00 AM
  #2  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
the jump in your curve at 4600rpms is the VICS opening up. If you could wire it open you would probably see anincrease across the board...

I have no clue about the second graph. Sounds like a supercharged graph with detonation. I can tell you've got the boost turned up or else your AF's would be in the 8's. These cars are friggin gas-pigs. I'm telling you right now you should SERIOUSLY purchase a Haltech F10X from me and run it's maps. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches and spare us from having to read "Well Matty was right....I blew my motor today"



Originally Posted by DonSVO
pull #1 was very similar to my 180 hp pull from last week. it peaked at 178.4 HP and 173 tq. the graph has a 'jump' about 4600ish RPM to 5000 RPM in which horsepower increases roughly 35ish. its like a 'step' in the power curve. nice arc, jump, arcs again. oh yes, the AF curve bottoms out then comes up to 12:1 then settles to 11.4-11.5. this would create the step.

now run #2 was completely different. peak HP was 174.8 and TQ was 188! the curve for HP was damn smooth up to about 5600 where it starts to jig-jag about 10ish HP to redline (spark breakup and an insanely low 11.4:1 AF ratio). AF ratio was a steady 11.5:1 without the sub-10 plunge. torque was also smooth and consistently was 15-20 lb/ft over my other run. BUT! the curve is linear and makes a nice arc, whereas all of my 178-180 hp pulls all exhibit lower torque/more peak HP/the 'jump' in the mid range.

i would like comments from others who have dynoed their MSPs: did you experience similar differences in your pulls? i want to know why my car sometimes yanks fuel and sometimes doesn't. also, read my other thread regarding developing a voltage limiter for creating boost over 10 PSI...
Old October-7th-2004 | 08:08 PM
  #3  
DonSVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 70
From: texas
DonSVO is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Roddimus Prime
the jump in your curve at 4600rpms is the VICS opening up. If you could wire it open you would probably see anincrease across the board...

I have no clue about the second graph. Sounds like a supercharged graph with detonation. I can tell you've got the boost turned up or else your AF's would be in the 8's. These cars are friggin gas-pigs. I'm telling you right now you should SERIOUSLY purchase a Haltech F10X from me and run it's maps. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches and spare us from having to read "Well Matty was right....I blew my motor today"
more than likely, you are right about the Haltech! i would like an Autronics tho... MMMmmmMMMMMMmmmmmmmMmMMmmm... but my pride would prevent me from ever posting up about busting a motor.
Old October-7th-2004 | 09:06 PM
  #4  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
****, thats the first thing I did...


I BLEW IT!!! WOOOHOO!!!

hahaha, but seriously the value of the $999 Haltech will shine the first time you start detonating....trust me.
Old October-7th-2004 | 10:24 PM
  #5  
macdaddyslomo's Avatar
Moderator/ Pocket Tuner
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,150
From: Tampa,Fl
macdaddyslomo is on a distinguished road
didnt think MSP's had VICS...MP3's didnt....
Old October-7th-2004 | 10:29 PM
  #6  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
yup mp3's are the only ones who DONT have it.....and what you mean is VTCS....


VICS is the secondary runner system....VTCS is the tumble control that makes the car sound like a diesel when cold.
Old October-8th-2004 | 06:53 PM
  #7  
Stueck's Avatar
Rotor Head
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,309
From: Charlotte NC
Stueck is on a distinguished road
VICS....VTCS....11.14:1 AF....




you lost me.
Old October-8th-2004 | 07:11 PM
  #8  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
VICS--variable intake control system---dual runners switchable based on rpms...

VTCS--valve tumble control system--helps it warm up faster

11.14 AF--air fuel ratio....the proportion of air to fuel....11.14parts of air to 1 part fuel....stoich is 14.17:1 (I believe). The leaner the mixture the more power but more prone to detonation. 11.17af is pretty good for a street car.
Old October-8th-2004 | 09:32 PM
  #9  
DonSVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 70
From: texas
DonSVO is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Roddimus Prime
stoich is 14.17:1 (I believe). The leaner the mixture the more power but more prone to detonation. 11.17af is pretty good for a street car.
14.7:1 is stoichiometric, but more power is made richer. somewhat leaner fuel curves make for nicer emissions.

12.5:1 on pump gas is pretty good.
Old October-9th-2004 | 12:01 PM
  #10  
vielster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 198
From: Remington, VA
vielster is on a distinguished road
By stoichiometric, do you mean the optimal ratio for combustion? Stoichiometric simply means a scientific calculation of a reactants in a reaction.

Also, I thought that richer mixtures made for better emmissions because the temperatures and dynamics of the combustion, the only leftovers are water vapor and carbon monoxide which can both be handled by the cats.

Leaner mixtures create nitrous oxides with their combustion which are "bad" polutants and aren't very well handled by the catalysts in the converters.

This is likely why when you get a CEL for the Cats, the engine starts running horribly rich losing power and mileage.

How can you get AF readings from the engine btw?
Old October-9th-2004 | 12:23 PM
  #11  
Stueck's Avatar
Rotor Head
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,309
From: Charlotte NC
Stueck is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Roddimus Prime
VICS--variable intake control system---dual runners switchable based on rpms...

VTCS--valve tumble control system--helps it warm up faster

11.14 AF--air fuel ratio....the proportion of air to fuel....11.14parts of air to 1 part fuel....stoich is 14.17:1 (I believe). The leaner the mixture the more power but more prone to detonation. 11.17af is pretty good for a street car.
ok, that makes a lot more sense. thanks matty. cant you tell im new?
Old October-9th-2004 | 12:44 PM
  #12  
Roddimus Prime's Avatar
The man behind the mask
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,572
From: Birmingham, AL
Roddimus Prime is on a distinguished road
Viletster. AFR's can be checked by wideband or narrowband o2 sensors. Forced induction cars (usually turbos) run a 3rd o2 sensor and that sensor is run directly to its own guage. This sniffs the exhaust gas before any cat and determines the pre-combustion mixture based on whats left over.

Ken from p-garage bought one for his turbop5 and it was $440. That is almost half what they retail for. They are very pricey and there is no tuneability with them...just monitoring. If you don't have a chasis dyno with wideband tuning near you though this is an invaluable tool as it will help you save your motor should it run lean.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
THEGOLDPRO
Photo and Video Gallery
13
June-18th-2005 11:50 AM
phat_mats
General Automotive
24
January-21st-2003 11:48 PM
Gavin
3rd gen Suspension/Brakes
7
November-11th-2002 07:00 PM
nathan rowe
1st Gen Protege/323/GLC
4
September-14th-2002 11:52 AM
RebelRacing
Exterior/Interior/Audio
2
July-9th-2002 10:54 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.