3rd Gen Protege/MazdaSpeed/P5/MP3 General/Maintenance Discussion for 1999-2003.5 Models Only (BJ Chassis)

Rev limiter in the P5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old April-9th-2002 | 04:51 PM
  #31  
kc5zom's Avatar
Certified Sick Individual
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,141
From: Houston, TX.
kc5zom is on a distinguished road
A lean condition is one in which ignition is actually taking place and there is not enough fuel present. It is not one where there is no fuel present at all. The systems in the Protege do not create a lean condition unless the air where you live has enough combustibles in it to actually ignite from the spark (if there even is one, if I worked for Mazda as an engineer I would have shut off the spark too, no sense wasting power). All your engine is doing is moving air. Air comes in the intake, cools off the cyclinder, and leaves the exhaust. I have had an '83 F-150 for years and I happen to understand the necessity to maintain a proper air fuel ratio. And I happen to have taken enough courses in automotive technology and chemistry to understand the principles of combustion. Please understand someones posts or ask questions before you snap off on tangents.
Old April-9th-2002 | 05:15 PM
  #32  
Brubeck's Avatar
Protege Enthusiast
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 326
From: New Jersey
Brubeck is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by LooseCannon


well remember me saying i got 16.7 in the 1/4? If you take the engine to almost the rev limiter - low 17's (like everyone else) My 16.7 was short shifting using the engines torque. I dropped my time by half a second! Now my secret is out.
I think you're missing the point though... the point was, if you are AutoX-ing, and for 3 seconds you have a choice between shifting up to third and back down again or bumping the rev limiter... you're going to be a lot faster if you're bumping the rev limiter.

Sure, if you're accelerating in a straight line, shifting the torque range will lower your time, but if you're choosing "to shift or not to shift" you'll be faster by not shifting.
Old April-9th-2002 | 09:21 PM
  #33  
kc5zom's Avatar
Certified Sick Individual
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,141
From: Houston, TX.
kc5zom is on a distinguished road
Running an engine without proper fuel for 1-2 seconds is not good. Running an engine without any fuel at all for 1-2 seconds (I only said 1 second to describe the delay between the fuel being turned off and back on) is fine. Now when you say "proper fuel" if you were referring to the no fuel at all condition I can think of no plausible way that doing that can damage the engine. All that little controlled explosion under your hood is doing is providing force to keep the crankshaft rotating. Allowing the crankshaft to get its turning power from the wheels is not going to hurt anything. As long as that crankshaft keeps turning the drive belt and turning the alternator you will not have any problems.
Old April-9th-2002 | 11:27 PM
  #34  
don668's Avatar
Neighbor of the Beast
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 305
From: Calgary AB
don668 is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
oh, and I ran the numbers through a simulation, and the correct shift points are...

6500
6500
6410
6500

Just recalc'd the numbers using 6800 rpm as a redline...shift points are...

6800
6750
6410
6510
Hey Jesse, these shift points are for what car and motor?

Just curious.

Don
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gzon
3rd Gen Protege/MazdaSpeed/P5/MP3
7
August-23rd-2004 02:16 AM
Protege52003
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
3
August-13th-2003 04:58 AM
94dxpro
1st gen/323/GLC Engine and Drivetrain
0
December-22nd-2001 06:22 PM
zoltan
3rd Gen Protege/MazdaSpeed/P5/MP3
2
November-23rd-2001 02:47 PM
wight
1st gen/323/GLC Engine and Drivetrain
7
October-25th-2001 04:55 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 AM.