if you understood the context of my comment, you will understand that what was said here has gotten too complicated of an explaination of something simple... ***

 

Hi Guys (Pseudo & Carguycw):
I am sorry to add confusion to the discussion. To be quite honest, that was NEVER my intent; I was only trying to be helpful (believe it or not).
You both are absolutely right in that simple vector type relationships are sufficient for most people's needs for these applications. I wasn't attempting to provide a practical solution, but rather, to describe the process and offer an explanation. This was meant only as support for your statements, not to discount the practicality of methods you proposed.
Unfortunately, buried within the convoluted nature of my writing, there often lies wicked and wry humour. This apparently becomes easily lost; perhaps misinterpreted. So obviously I am neither a technical writer nor comic, but dammit, sometimes I am just having a bit of fun while trying to be useful.
Upon reflection, I felt very badly this weekend about the tone of my last post to you. I too, do not wish to be made into an idiot either, which is what I inferred. Thus my harsh response. I do sincerely apologize to you both (and to the poor, innocent folks who may have read through all of that crap).
As I said earlier, both of you seem to be strong, knowledgeable assets and i always enjoy your posts (unless you're ******' w/ me, that is - LOL). I do realize you have to cull the extraneous garbage from the truth here, so there are no bad feelings on my part and I would like to move on, too!
Thanks