ABS Plastic vs. Polyurethane
#2
the way I understood was that polyeruetahne is lighter and a little stronger but requires painting. and ABS plastic is basically made with the color already in it, so if it scratches you still have the color underneath....
i could be wrong though.
i could be wrong though.
#3
ABS is polystyrene plastic with a synthetic rubber component (butyl) added to it, to make it "tougher" (less prone to cracking, and more able to withstand impact without shattering). It is a thermoplastic, which means it can be melted and reprocessed. Thermoplastics have long polymer chains that are not connected to one another.
Uerethane is a thermoset material, meaning that it also has long polymer chains, but they are cross linked. This means that it takes a chemical reaction to process the material, and once the part is formed, it cannot be melted down and reused. It will instead burn if heated. Other thermosets include resins used for fiberglass, bondo, or even two part paints used in autobody. Ployeurethane is not the same thing, but the chemical process is similar.
For suspension bushings, bumpers, and other parts where taking sustained impacts without significant damage is important, Polyuerthane is a much better material. Especially for things like bushings, where friction is constant, heat can build up, and ABS would melt. Polyuerethane is much more resistant to heat (before degradation occurs) and much more resistant to impacts. But it costs more.
Uerethane is a thermoset material, meaning that it also has long polymer chains, but they are cross linked. This means that it takes a chemical reaction to process the material, and once the part is formed, it cannot be melted down and reused. It will instead burn if heated. Other thermosets include resins used for fiberglass, bondo, or even two part paints used in autobody. Ployeurethane is not the same thing, but the chemical process is similar.
For suspension bushings, bumpers, and other parts where taking sustained impacts without significant damage is important, Polyuerthane is a much better material. Especially for things like bushings, where friction is constant, heat can build up, and ABS would melt. Polyuerethane is much more resistant to heat (before degradation occurs) and much more resistant to impacts. But it costs more.
#4
Polyurathane is light like fiberglass but much stronger than fiberglass and even abs. However ABS isnt bad at all if fact I would take it over fiberglass. My friend has a neon and be bought a full abs body kit from AVS and it had to be painted so I believe no matter which way u go ur going to have to paint
#5
Originally Posted by sstylezprotege
Polyurathane is light like fiberglass but much stronger than fiberglass and even abs. However ABS isnt bad at all if fact I would take it over fiberglass. My friend has a neon and be bought a full abs body kit from AVS and it had to be painted so I believe no matter which way u go ur going to have to paint
Fiberglass is a composite (it has glass strands in it, which are suspended in a thermoplastic resin). Polyuerethane is not. Nor is ABS. In a composite material, the glass or (in the case of carbon fiber, carbon filaments) strengthen and reinforce the finished part.
#7
Originally Posted by juddz
ABS is polystyrene plastic with a synthetic rubber component (butyl) added to it, to make it "tougher" (less prone to cracking, and more able to withstand impact without shattering). It is a thermoplastic, which means it can be melted and reprocessed. Thermoplastics have long polymer chains that are not connected to one another.
Uerethane is a thermoset material, meaning that it also has long polymer chains, but they are cross linked. This means that it takes a chemical reaction to process the material, and once the part is formed, it cannot be melted down and reused. It will instead burn if heated. Other thermosets include resins used for fiberglass, bondo, or even two part paints used in autobody. Ployeurethane is not the same thing, but the chemical process is similar.
For suspension bushings, bumpers, and other parts where taking sustained impacts without significant damage is important, Polyuerthane is a much better material. Especially for things like bushings, where friction is constant, heat can build up, and ABS would melt. Polyuerethane is much more resistant to heat (before degradation occurs) and much more resistant to impacts. But it costs more.
Uerethane is a thermoset material, meaning that it also has long polymer chains, but they are cross linked. This means that it takes a chemical reaction to process the material, and once the part is formed, it cannot be melted down and reused. It will instead burn if heated. Other thermosets include resins used for fiberglass, bondo, or even two part paints used in autobody. Ployeurethane is not the same thing, but the chemical process is similar.
For suspension bushings, bumpers, and other parts where taking sustained impacts without significant damage is important, Polyuerthane is a much better material. Especially for things like bushings, where friction is constant, heat can build up, and ABS would melt. Polyuerethane is much more resistant to heat (before degradation occurs) and much more resistant to impacts. But it costs more.
#11
Originally Posted by dudeondacouch
...but can you get to the minus world in Super Mario Bros?
Actually, its funny you should mention video games, because the other day I got pissed off and quit playing Doom after the second level. Video games just aren't my thing. 'Spose I should stick to drinking beer as a second hobby.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jster28
3rd Gen Protege/MazdaSpeed/P5/MP3
2
February-9th-2005 09:58 PM
biknman
3rd gen Engine/Drivetrain
1
March-18th-2002 09:18 PM
abs, composit, difference, eyelids, fiberglass, material, plastic, poly, polyeurthane, polymer, polyurethane, price, pu, sink, vs
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)