finally got my roll cage !!
#32
Originally posted by TheMAN
it's NOT a roll cage if someone can sit in the back seat, simple as that
your ignorant comments about being used for autocross is baseless... SCCA/NASA does NOT require a roll cage or roll bar for solo2 if you have a HARD TOP car
it's NOT a roll cage if someone can sit in the back seat, simple as that
your ignorant comments about being used for autocross is baseless... SCCA/NASA does NOT require a roll cage or roll bar for solo2 if you have a HARD TOP car
well n e ways people i will post pics once i get it back from getting developed and put on CD... did have a digi cam but it broke on me so gotta do it the classic way.will get pics up before friday. sorry for the delay ....
#33
Pic from AWR's Laguna Seca P5 pace car:
Since they used it in the pace car it must meet some kind of safety specs.
Like I said before .. do Solo 1 and then people will stop calling "rice" on it There is no point for autocross unless you need to claim negative points in STS .. does SCCA even have that rule?
Since they used it in the pace car it must meet some kind of safety specs.
Like I said before .. do Solo 1 and then people will stop calling "rice" on it There is no point for autocross unless you need to claim negative points in STS .. does SCCA even have that rule?
Last edited by rowan; April-8th-2003 at 01:20 PM.
#34
that is the DG motorsports Carbon Cage. I don't think that it is sanctioned because I don't think that DG payed to have it tested. Who cares if it isn't completely functional. Meaning using it in a race for rollover protection. It still has some functionality to it by reinforcing the chassis making it stiffer and possibly by connecting harnesses to it(not sure of the postion so don't know if that is safe or not. But I do agree that the cage is at least 50% show. Hell most of the stuff that goes on our cars is show. not saying rice but saying show. I mean how many people are seriuosly worried about how much difference a CF hood is going to make to their car. No they want the look and the weight savings is just a side benefit. Smae here. He wanted the race look and the stiffness it offers is just a side benefit. You guys really need to chill with all the rice crap. Haven't we learned yet that calling rice on any topic starts wars and ends up with threads that have pages of crap in them in stead of helpful info. Just trying to help out here. Get over it and move on!
#35
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rowan
Pic from AWR's Laguna Seca P5 pace car:
Since they used it in the pace car it must meet some kind of safety specs.
Like I said before .. do Solo 1 and then people will stop calling "rice" on it There is no point for autocross unless you need to claim negative points in STS .. does SCCA even have that rule? [/QUO
well whatever the rules are i dont know ... i havent even read them yet... so whatever they are ill be using for autocross/solo1.
but i still dont under stand how is rice ... but enough about this ... this is going no where ? all we're doing is ranting back and fourth, on why im using this roll bar, and its no use. or whatever.
we're all suppose be helping each other out in here. Anyways thanks for the pics will post mine whenever i get them back.
Pic from AWR's Laguna Seca P5 pace car:
Since they used it in the pace car it must meet some kind of safety specs.
Like I said before .. do Solo 1 and then people will stop calling "rice" on it There is no point for autocross unless you need to claim negative points in STS .. does SCCA even have that rule? [/QUO
well whatever the rules are i dont know ... i havent even read them yet... so whatever they are ill be using for autocross/solo1.
but i still dont under stand how is rice ... but enough about this ... this is going no where ? all we're doing is ranting back and fourth, on why im using this roll bar, and its no use. or whatever.
we're all suppose be helping each other out in here. Anyways thanks for the pics will post mine whenever i get them back.
#36
Originally posted by FuNwAgoN
that is the DG motorsports Carbon Cage. I don't think that it is sanctioned because I don't think that DG payed to have it tested. Who cares if it isn't completely functional. Meaning using it in a race for rollover protection. It still has some functionality to it by reinforcing the chassis making it stiffer and possibly by connecting harnesses to it(not sure of the postion so don't know if that is safe or not. But I do agree that the cage is at least 50% show. Hell most of the stuff that goes on our cars is show. not saying rice but saying show. I mean how many people are seriuosly worried about how much difference a CF hood is going to make to their car. No they want the look and the weight savings is just a side benefit. Smae here. He wanted the race look and the stiffness it offers is just a side benefit. You guys really need to chill with all the rice crap. Haven't we learned yet that calling rice on any topic starts wars and ends up with threads that have pages of crap in them in stead of helpful info. Just trying to help out here. Get over it and move on!
that is the DG motorsports Carbon Cage. I don't think that it is sanctioned because I don't think that DG payed to have it tested. Who cares if it isn't completely functional. Meaning using it in a race for rollover protection. It still has some functionality to it by reinforcing the chassis making it stiffer and possibly by connecting harnesses to it(not sure of the postion so don't know if that is safe or not. But I do agree that the cage is at least 50% show. Hell most of the stuff that goes on our cars is show. not saying rice but saying show. I mean how many people are seriuosly worried about how much difference a CF hood is going to make to their car. No they want the look and the weight savings is just a side benefit. Smae here. He wanted the race look and the stiffness it offers is just a side benefit. You guys really need to chill with all the rice crap. Haven't we learned yet that calling rice on any topic starts wars and ends up with threads that have pages of crap in them in stead of helpful info. Just trying to help out here. Get over it and move on!
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by MIA protege
damn i hate when people say they have this and they r going to post pics soon and they never do ... damnit i wanna see pics
Danny
damn i hate when people say they have this and they r going to post pics soon and they never do ... damnit i wanna see pics
Danny
I know it is a edited pic , it is just the principle of the thing
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
It's a nice bar, but I really don't see the need for it , If you seriousle road race ( meaning { your car does not see street duty}) then I can understand... but for a street car that occasionally autocrosses, and is daily driven. It would be just better for you to install braces,..
Ofcourse this is just my opinon , I don't know how much people would agree with me {shrug}
Ofcourse this is just my opinon , I don't know how much people would agree with me {shrug}
#40
Originally posted by Bruce95fmla
why is the protege in your sig moving and there is noone driving it ....??????????????????
I know it is a edited pic , it is just the principle of the thing
why is the protege in your sig moving and there is noone driving it ....??????????????????
I know it is a edited pic , it is just the principle of the thing
Danny
#43
Originally posted by Bruce95fmla
why is the protege in your sig moving and there is noone driving it ....??????????????????
why is the protege in your sig moving and there is noone driving it ....??????????????????
He was testing it on that first before he put it in his Pro. He's a smart and handy guy.
#45
Originally posted by redrims
Well incase y'all didn't know, Danny did this to his car. The kit to make your car like KIT
He was testing it on that first before he put it in his Pro. He's a smart and handy guy.
Well incase y'all didn't know, Danny did this to his car. The kit to make your car like KIT
He was testing it on that first before he put it in his Pro. He's a smart and handy guy.