0-60 times..
#10
Originally posted by iwokeupfrmadrea
if urs isnt under 6, then its a cruel cruel world
if urs isnt under 6, then its a cruel cruel world
#12
For those 1/4 mile times (14.3 @ 98), I'd put the 0-60 somewhere between 5.5-6.5. If I had to guess...5.7 secs., launch dependent.
Some Car and Driver times:
'03 Honda Accord V-6 6-spd. 0-60 - 5.9 sec. -14.5 @ 98 mph - FWD with 215's
'03 BMW 330i Perf package 0-60 - 5.6 sec. -14.3 @ 97 mph - RWD with huge tires
'03 Dodge Neon SRT-4 0-60 5.6 sec. - 14.1 @ 102 mph - FWD 205 tires
'03 Nissan 350Z convertible 0-60 5.5 sec - 14.3 @ 99 mph - RWD
'03 Porsche Boxster (non-S) 0-60 6.0 sec - 14.6 @ 98 mph - too much traction?
It's hard to compare FWD with RWD, although it certainly looks like you launch well (14.3). The Accord matches the speed, but is 0.2 slower. So it has a little more HP, but less traction off the line. The Neon obviously could benefit from more traction, with a 5.9 sec. street start (5-60).
Are you on slicks with that time, or just really good street tires?
Some Car and Driver times:
'03 Honda Accord V-6 6-spd. 0-60 - 5.9 sec. -14.5 @ 98 mph - FWD with 215's
'03 BMW 330i Perf package 0-60 - 5.6 sec. -14.3 @ 97 mph - RWD with huge tires
'03 Dodge Neon SRT-4 0-60 5.6 sec. - 14.1 @ 102 mph - FWD 205 tires
'03 Nissan 350Z convertible 0-60 5.5 sec - 14.3 @ 99 mph - RWD
'03 Porsche Boxster (non-S) 0-60 6.0 sec - 14.6 @ 98 mph - too much traction?
It's hard to compare FWD with RWD, although it certainly looks like you launch well (14.3). The Accord matches the speed, but is 0.2 slower. So it has a little more HP, but less traction off the line. The Neon obviously could benefit from more traction, with a 5.9 sec. street start (5-60).
Are you on slicks with that time, or just really good street tires?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)