Mazdasped 3 vs. WRX??
#1
Mazdasped 3 vs. WRX??
Ok, so I hear the Mazdaspeed 3 is probably going to cost like $25k. That puts it right into WRX price range. I like Mazda and all, but give me a break, are you really going to pass up a WRX for a 170hp, front wheel drive, orange car?? What do you guys think? I think that at <$21k it would be a great deal, but not at 25...
#2
I think that was supposed to be the price in canadian currency that they were hoping for, but I'd assume as much as $30k can.
I could be wrong though... I don't see that car being $25... at least I hope.
I think it's a great alternative to the WRX... Sure, AWD is great for launches, but AWD also adds a lot of weight and sapping power. I haven't seen any dynos, but I'd assume the WRX suffers from a high % of drivetrain HP loss.
While the flywheel HP is about a 50 HP difference between the WRX and the Mazdaspeed, I think it's safe to say the difference in HP at the wheels would be cut as much as half of that. That's probably being a little optimistic, but AWD really robs power.
Also, I've never driven an AWD vehicle, so I'm not sure about the handling, but you better believe the mazdaspeed will have top notch handling in terms of inexpensive production cars. I think everyones expectations are MP3 handling if not better, and many magazines, etc. have praised the MP3 for it's handling.
All in all, it's not a very close comparison, even if the cars were made to compete in the same market. I'd take the mazdaspeed anyday, AT LEAST to be different, amoung other reasons.
I could be wrong though... I don't see that car being $25... at least I hope.
I think it's a great alternative to the WRX... Sure, AWD is great for launches, but AWD also adds a lot of weight and sapping power. I haven't seen any dynos, but I'd assume the WRX suffers from a high % of drivetrain HP loss.
While the flywheel HP is about a 50 HP difference between the WRX and the Mazdaspeed, I think it's safe to say the difference in HP at the wheels would be cut as much as half of that. That's probably being a little optimistic, but AWD really robs power.
Also, I've never driven an AWD vehicle, so I'm not sure about the handling, but you better believe the mazdaspeed will have top notch handling in terms of inexpensive production cars. I think everyones expectations are MP3 handling if not better, and many magazines, etc. have praised the MP3 for it's handling.
All in all, it's not a very close comparison, even if the cars were made to compete in the same market. I'd take the mazdaspeed anyday, AT LEAST to be different, amoung other reasons.
#4
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
0-60 is all about traction, not power.
Put some cheater slicks on the Mazdaspeed Protege and on a drag strip and see what it can do.
0-60 is all about traction, not power.
Put some cheater slicks on the Mazdaspeed Protege and on a drag strip and see what it can do.
Yeah but that ain't cool, we talking about as a daily driver. The WRX will smoke the Mazdaspeed Protege. And 0-60 is a combination of both traction and power not just one or the other.
#5
Originally posted by Sweedenhouse
Yeah but that ain't cool, we talking about as a daily driver. The WRX will smoke the Mazdaspeed Protege. And 0-60 is a combination of both traction and power not just one or the other.
Yeah but that ain't cool, we talking about as a daily driver. The WRX will smoke the Mazdaspeed Protege. And 0-60 is a combination of both traction and power not just one or the other.
Hillsboro, Or- I am going to be there on the weekend of the 19th for the Rally
#6
Originally posted by funkdaddysmack
I think that was supposed to be the price in canadian currency that they were hoping for, but I'd assume as much as $30k can.
I could be wrong though... I don't see that car being $25... at least I hope.
I think it's a great alternative to the WRX... Sure, AWD is great for launches, but AWD also adds a lot of weight and sapping power. I haven't seen any dynos, but I'd assume the WRX suffers from a high % of drivetrain HP loss.
While the flywheel HP is about a 50 HP difference between the WRX and the Mazdaspeed, I think it's safe to say the difference in HP at the wheels would be cut as much as half of that. That's probably being a little optimistic, but AWD really robs power.
Also, I've never driven an AWD vehicle, so I'm not sure about the handling, but you better believe the mazdaspeed will have top notch handling in terms of inexpensive production cars. I think everyones expectations are MP3 handling if not better, and many magazines, etc. have praised the MP3 for it's handling.
All in all, it's not a very close comparison, even if the cars were made to compete in the same market. I'd take the mazdaspeed anyday, AT LEAST to be different, amoung other reasons.
I think that was supposed to be the price in canadian currency that they were hoping for, but I'd assume as much as $30k can.
I could be wrong though... I don't see that car being $25... at least I hope.
I think it's a great alternative to the WRX... Sure, AWD is great for launches, but AWD also adds a lot of weight and sapping power. I haven't seen any dynos, but I'd assume the WRX suffers from a high % of drivetrain HP loss.
While the flywheel HP is about a 50 HP difference between the WRX and the Mazdaspeed, I think it's safe to say the difference in HP at the wheels would be cut as much as half of that. That's probably being a little optimistic, but AWD really robs power.
Also, I've never driven an AWD vehicle, so I'm not sure about the handling, but you better believe the mazdaspeed will have top notch handling in terms of inexpensive production cars. I think everyones expectations are MP3 handling if not better, and many magazines, etc. have praised the MP3 for it's handling.
All in all, it's not a very close comparison, even if the cars were made to compete in the same market. I'd take the mazdaspeed anyday, AT LEAST to be different, amoung other reasons.
#7
Oh there's no way that they won't meet 170 hp. Then it would make the car really unattractive, especially to those that don't also look at the torque...
I mean, how could they not attain 170 hp with a turbocharged 2.0 L engine?
I guess we'll wait and see.
I say bring Peugot 206 over here, WRC spec or not, doesn't matter!!!
I mean, how could they not attain 170 hp with a turbocharged 2.0 L engine?
I guess we'll wait and see.
I say bring Peugot 206 over here, WRC spec or not, doesn't matter!!!
#8
Okay, here's actually my final verdict, but unfortunately, this is based largely on what I've seen in an MP3, and from what I remember of the WRX at an auto show last year.
Interior- MS Protege in a blowout. Starting from the finish, colours, on to the audio system.
Exterior- MS Protege again in a blowout. This is totally subjective though as I think that Subarus are ugly. Nicer wheels help too
Power- WRX obviously. 227 hp to 170hp... torque numbers that somebody calculated came out to 160ish for the Protege? Not sure about WRX but I'm sure it's around 210
Handling- In normal conditions, MP3 maybe a slight edge, especially if it beat the WRX time around a street track as claimed by Callaway people. In snow, rain, mud, etc. WRX obviously because of the AWD. If you're in Florida though, that's useless hehe.
There you have it, please correct me if I'm wrong...
I go for the MS Protege (uh oh, MS Protege, not Microsoft again!), and pocket the change that I have left over from not getting the WRX. This is because of the looks for me though, and the fact that I love my Protege right now. I'm biased, so what.
Interior- MS Protege in a blowout. Starting from the finish, colours, on to the audio system.
Exterior- MS Protege again in a blowout. This is totally subjective though as I think that Subarus are ugly. Nicer wheels help too
Power- WRX obviously. 227 hp to 170hp... torque numbers that somebody calculated came out to 160ish for the Protege? Not sure about WRX but I'm sure it's around 210
Handling- In normal conditions, MP3 maybe a slight edge, especially if it beat the WRX time around a street track as claimed by Callaway people. In snow, rain, mud, etc. WRX obviously because of the AWD. If you're in Florida though, that's useless hehe.
There you have it, please correct me if I'm wrong...
I go for the MS Protege (uh oh, MS Protege, not Microsoft again!), and pocket the change that I have left over from not getting the WRX. This is because of the looks for me though, and the fact that I love my Protege right now. I'm biased, so what.
#9
Re: Mazdasped 3 vs. WRX??
Originally posted by blades242
Ok, so I hear the Mazdaspeed 3 is probably going to cost like $25k. That puts it right into WRX price range. I like Mazda and all, but give me a break, are you really going to pass up a WRX for a 170hp, front wheel drive, orange car?? What do you guys think? I think that at <$21k it would be a great deal, but not at 25...
Ok, so I hear the Mazdaspeed 3 is probably going to cost like $25k. That puts it right into WRX price range. I like Mazda and all, but give me a break, are you really going to pass up a WRX for a 170hp, front wheel drive, orange car?? What do you guys think? I think that at <$21k it would be a great deal, but not at 25...
my $0.02
Stocker
#10
Jesse, im not following you on the target thing. Do you think the 170 is high or low?
Another thing I was thinking about was the aftermarket support for the WRX...
If the MS3 rings in at $22k that would be a pretty good deal, but I bet it gets dealer markup...
Another thing I was thinking about was the aftermarket support for the WRX...
If the MS3 rings in at $22k that would be a pretty good deal, but I bet it gets dealer markup...
#11
Originally posted by blades242
Jesse, im not following you on the target thing. Do you think the 170 is high or low?
Another thing I was thinking about was the aftermarket support for the WRX...
If the MS3 rings in at $22k that would be a pretty good deal, but I bet it gets dealer markup...
Jesse, im not following you on the target thing. Do you think the 170 is high or low?
Another thing I was thinking about was the aftermarket support for the WRX...
If the MS3 rings in at $22k that would be a pretty good deal, but I bet it gets dealer markup...
The MS pro has the same aftermarket WE have now. Also, there's not a whole lot left to do to the car except for a boost controller.
I agree there will be some dealer markup. They'll sell the car for the market demand, which seems to be high. What can you do?
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by blades242
Jesse, im not following you on the target thing. Do you think the 170 is high or low?
Another thing I was thinking about was the aftermarket support for the WRX...
If the MS3 rings in at $22k that would be a pretty good deal, but I bet it gets dealer markup...
Jesse, im not following you on the target thing. Do you think the 170 is high or low?
Another thing I was thinking about was the aftermarket support for the WRX...
If the MS3 rings in at $22k that would be a pretty good deal, but I bet it gets dealer markup...
Another way of looking at it. 170 hp is only 30 hp more than the MP3, and 40 more than the regular 2.0L engine. And the 155 ft.lbs rating is only 13 ft.lbs more than the MP3 and 20 ft.lbs more than the regular 2.0.
Only 20 ft.lbs would be hard to manage. For it's low-pressure turbo, Volvo raises the power from 168 hp and 170 ft.lbs to 197 hp and 210 ft.lbs. And this is far from a performance application.
The last 2.2L F-series turbo was rated at only 145 hp, but at only 4300 rpm. Most mags said that the power figure was more like 185 hp, and acceleration times proved that out.
And 0-60 times are a big traction indicator. My Altima runs 0-60 in about 6.3 secs (compared to the WRX at 5.4-5.7). But at the end of the 1/4 mile, the Altima is going at least 5 mph faster, and with a good launch, it will beat it to the end by a good 1/2 sec. or more. This in a 200 lb heavier car with only 13 more Hp.
Other things to consider. The Protege is much larger inside. No way anyone can sit behind me in a WRX (I'm a tall 6'3"), unless they don't have legs. But the Protege has plenty of room.
And the WRX achieves it's amazing performance at the expense of daily driving ease. The engine is largely dead below 3500 rpm. Unless you're willing to be at full-throttle all the time, you will be lagging behind traffic (I realize that for some people, this isn't a problem, but for the rest of us, it probably is.). IIRC, the WRX uses 14psi boost. Presumably, there isn't a lot more (safely) in the engine (if local SM autocrossers are any gauge). Not to mention the fragile trannies (which is fixed with the upcoming STi version's 6-speed).
#14
Originally posted by PseudoRealityX
Yup, basically summed it up.
Building the engine, bigger turbo, port the manifold, bigger piping, bigger wastegate, fuel pump, injectors, stand alone.....HOURS ON A DYNO = awesome performance
Yup, basically summed it up.
Building the engine, bigger turbo, port the manifold, bigger piping, bigger wastegate, fuel pump, injectors, stand alone.....HOURS ON A DYNO = awesome performance
#15
Originally posted by Davard
And 0-60 times are a big traction indicator. My Altima runs 0-60 in about 6.3 secs (compared to the WRX at 5.4-5.7). But at the end of the 1/4 mile, the Altima is going at least 5 mph faster, and with a good launch, it will beat it to the end by a good 1/2 sec. or more. This in a 200 lb heavier car with only 13 more Hp.
And 0-60 times are a big traction indicator. My Altima runs 0-60 in about 6.3 secs (compared to the WRX at 5.4-5.7). But at the end of the 1/4 mile, the Altima is going at least 5 mph faster, and with a good launch, it will beat it to the end by a good 1/2 sec. or more. This in a 200 lb heavier car with only 13 more Hp.
the 227hp WRX runs 14.1 1/4mi
cobb tuning sells an upgrade that'll put the WRX at 320hp but, it seems that the tranny is the weak point on the car.