WTC Ideas
#1
WTC Ideas
Since Ground Zero was closed, what's next?
Think they should just have a big park in memorium?
Think The should rebuild the same?
Think they should rebuild different? Maybe bigger and better?
I want to her opinions.
This was ganked from other forums but what do you think about this?
http://wtc2002.com/start.lasso
Think they should just have a big park in memorium?
Think The should rebuild the same?
Think they should rebuild different? Maybe bigger and better?
I want to her opinions.
This was ganked from other forums but what do you think about this?
http://wtc2002.com/start.lasso
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
I honestly have to tell you that there won't be a park , there most likely will be a small memorial park yes, but you have to remeber that the WTC was the main financial building , everything went down in that building and the others , so they will most likely 98% rebuild the building , but I can guarantee that it won't be as tall as the twin towers was, simply cause of evacuation reasons, and also the threat of the landmark being a target for aholes in the future
Bruce
Bruce
#6
I think a park or a memorial would be a great idea. Building another tower(s) would be a waste of time, money and effort. IMO. Also I do not think any other tower(s) would be able to carry the same iamge that WTC towers used to have (before 9/11). IMO
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by turbonium959
I think a park or a memorial would be a great idea. Building another tower(s) would be a waste of time, money and effort. IMO. Also I do not think any other tower(s) would be able to carry the same iamge that WTC towers used to have (before 9/11). IMO
I think a park or a memorial would be a great idea. Building another tower(s) would be a waste of time, money and effort. IMO. Also I do not think any other tower(s) would be able to carry the same iamge that WTC towers used to have (before 9/11). IMO
Bruce
#8
well, i think they should rebuild and make it just as tall or even taller. but also add emergency slides for evacuation. maybe every 4 flights or so, alongside the emergency stairs. faster evac time, and since they'll be short rides, it'll be pretty safe.
but they should rebuild to show the world the us ain't a bunch of panties.
but they should rebuild to show the world the us ain't a bunch of panties.
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Protégé Ménacé
???? it makes perfect sense to rebuild, why let an EXPENSIVE plot of land go to waste as a park?
it would make mroe money to rebild and be able to USE the land to make money...
think of it this way. Your house burns down. Now do you make a park in its place? and then ahev to buy ANOTHER plot of land? or do you jsut build another house, which is cheaper...
???? it makes perfect sense to rebuild, why let an EXPENSIVE plot of land go to waste as a park?
it would make mroe money to rebild and be able to USE the land to make money...
think of it this way. Your house burns down. Now do you make a park in its place? and then ahev to buy ANOTHER plot of land? or do you jsut build another house, which is cheaper...
Bruce
#10
Originally posted by Bruce95fmla
yeah but if you loose your son or daughter in that house do you move back in ,,, this is just on the flip side of the coin and I am not trying to upset anyone ,, just an opinion
Bruce
yeah but if you loose your son or daughter in that house do you move back in ,,, this is just on the flip side of the coin and I am not trying to upset anyone ,, just an opinion
Bruce
but, ultimately $$$ wins, they'll probably rebuild it back into commercial buildings, with a tiny little plaque somewhere saying this is where 9/11 happened...
#11
I think that all those events (and loss of lives)are worth more to americans than a park,or a re-building of it all.
As for the landmark issue,if they rebuild the towers as tall as they were,its almost a provocation for the nation/faction who destroyed the 1st towers...rebuiding taller skycrapers would not only confirm that americans are excessively proud and ''strong'' from their own point of view,it would also just make it easier for the ennemy to target that same place again.....i am neutral when it comes to politics/religion/patriotism but i still have an opinion on all this,and I believe they should just make a giant university on that land.
As for the landmark issue,if they rebuild the towers as tall as they were,its almost a provocation for the nation/faction who destroyed the 1st towers...rebuiding taller skycrapers would not only confirm that americans are excessively proud and ''strong'' from their own point of view,it would also just make it easier for the ennemy to target that same place again.....i am neutral when it comes to politics/religion/patriotism but i still have an opinion on all this,and I believe they should just make a giant university on that land.
#12
Well speaking as a person who used to live in NYC, saw the World Trade Center fall with my own eyes, and lose dear friends in it, you'd think I want a big park.
In my eyes no. The WTC made the New York City skyline. I never could imagine it without it. If it was up to me, I say, rebuild it EXACTLY the same. Take the necessary precautions to make sure it doesn't happen again.
What would be a bigger "F U" to the terrorists, than to not even be able to tell that the WTC was destroyed. Of course, the promenade around the WTC should be in memory. Say ever brick that makes up the walkway have a name on it. Or a museum.
Of course I doubt that will ever happen. Like it was posted before. It is owned by one person. One person holds the deed to that property, and basically it is up to them. God help us if they have bad taste.
In my eyes no. The WTC made the New York City skyline. I never could imagine it without it. If it was up to me, I say, rebuild it EXACTLY the same. Take the necessary precautions to make sure it doesn't happen again.
What would be a bigger "F U" to the terrorists, than to not even be able to tell that the WTC was destroyed. Of course, the promenade around the WTC should be in memory. Say ever brick that makes up the walkway have a name on it. Or a museum.
Of course I doubt that will ever happen. Like it was posted before. It is owned by one person. One person holds the deed to that property, and basically it is up to them. God help us if they have bad taste.
#14
i think they should make 4 smaller towers, with a memorial in the center of it, i think that would make everyne happy, though i gotta admit, placing a few SAMs up there would be a good idea, also i think the army should base there antiterroism offices out of ther too, just so Bin LAden knows that he helped build them
#15
Originally posted by Protégé Ménacé
think of it this way. Your house burns down. Now do you make a park in its place? and then ahev to buy ANOTHER plot of land? or do you jsut build another house, which is cheaper...
think of it this way. Your house burns down. Now do you make a park in its place? and then ahev to buy ANOTHER plot of land? or do you jsut build another house, which is cheaper...