Who needs a U-Haul!?
#3
That's got to be a photo shop job. A very good photo shop job. I mean come on why would you put all that money into a trailer for no reason. By that I mean the ground effects, the wheels, tires, suspension, and exhaust on something that you can't drive. It doesn't make sense. And if it was a photo shop job the guy covered everything and must have spent alot of time on it. If it's real the guy is an idiot but I have to admit it does look good.
#5
You know after lookinga t this for a while and thinking(can you smell the smoke yet). The only way I could see someone cutting off the front end is if it were hit in the front and was considered totaled. That way you wouldn't really be wasting the car. But I don't know how the insurance companies would be able to let some one do that with a "totaled" car.
#6
When a car gets totaled by an insurance company, it can usually then either be bought back by the owner pretty cheap, or it goes to an auction. These cars often times have "salvage titles", meaning they're mainly just for parts now, but can sometimes be rebuilt. And no, that's not a Photoshop job!
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
To some its a wast of cash $130 grand to do a conversion like that, but others pay 2 million for there ride (Enzo Ferrari) It aint a wast if the owners want it and it looks good, The only reason we see it as a wast is cause were broke and we have never spent $130 grand on anything let alone a ride, but we all break our banks getting as much Hp out of our rides as we can. If you hold what we spend on our cars relative to how much we make and then compare it to the amout of $130 grand he spent relative to what he makes and buck made for buck spent we spend more. Its only that we make less.