MX-6 vs. Protege DX
#1
MX-6 vs. Protege DX
My best friend finally moved back to Tampa from Illinois,and he's been talking crap about his old *** '91 MX-6....let get you guys opinion...I did some research and here's what I found..his stock 2.2 ohv rates at 110 hp his car weighs in at 3700+lbs..its got 150,000 miles on it and he's bone stock....My 1.6L DOHC rates at 105hp and I weigh in at 3400 lbs...ive got 34,000 miles on mine and I did run my CAI which definitely makes an improvement but I dont know how much..both 5 speeds..I think I can whoop his ***....what do you guys think??
#2
I beleive you have an excellent chance.....with the power to weight ratio very close like it is....its going to boil down to things like
the launch/reaction time
traction/tires
profeciency at shifting
so go for it...and HOUND HIS *** when you beat him. :{D
the launch/reaction time
traction/tires
profeciency at shifting
so go for it...and HOUND HIS *** when you beat him. :{D
#3
Hmmm... Your numbers are a bit off...
1991 Mazda MX-6 DX
2.2L SOHC I-4
110 hp
130 ft-lbs
2,560 lbs
2000 Mazda Protege DX
1.6L DOHC I-4
105 hp
106 ft-lbs
2,434 lbs
Are you sure his is just a base model? There's also the turbo with 35 extra hp and 60 extra ft-lbs. However, if it is a base model, you may stand a chance, but I would give the nod to the MX-6 just from sheer numbers. If his is a turbo... well, then you wouldn't stand a chance.
-Jerry
1991 Mazda MX-6 DX
2.2L SOHC I-4
110 hp
130 ft-lbs
2,560 lbs
2000 Mazda Protege DX
1.6L DOHC I-4
105 hp
106 ft-lbs
2,434 lbs
Are you sure his is just a base model? There's also the turbo with 35 extra hp and 60 extra ft-lbs. However, if it is a base model, you may stand a chance, but I would give the nod to the MX-6 just from sheer numbers. If his is a turbo... well, then you wouldn't stand a chance.
-Jerry
#4
dont know where you got your weight numbers....we looked at the GWVR inside the doors and his read 3765 lbs and mine read 3425lbs..so I'll believe our actual cars vs your book or website..also I know about the MX-6 and I've been under the hood of his car helping him fix it...It's an LX as in NO TURBO..the GT was the only model with turbo...also I posted mileage for a reason...anyone who knows about cars knows that high mileage engines do not maintain their original compression,and lose some horsepower...so I think he's only got me in one dept:torque,and I suspect with 150,000 miles,and an oil leak,he doesnt have me by much...plus his clutch is slipping
#6
dont know where you got your weight numbers....we looked at the GWVR inside the doors and his read 3765 lbs and mine read 3425lbs..
Where did I get my numbers from? I'm a certified Mazda Product Master.
-Jerry
#7
Originally posted by macdaddyslomo
dont know where you got your weight numbers....we looked at the GWVR inside the doors and his read 3765 lbs and mine read 3425lbs..so I'll believe our actual cars vs your book or website..also I know about the MX-6 and I've been under the hood of his car helping him fix it...It's an LX as in NO TURBO..the GT was the only model with turbo...also I posted mileage for a reason...anyone who knows about cars knows that high mileage engines do not maintain their original compression,and lose some horsepower...so I think he's only got me in one dept:torque,and I suspect with 150,000 miles,and an oil leak,he doesnt have me by much...plus his clutch is slipping
dont know where you got your weight numbers....we looked at the GWVR inside the doors and his read 3765 lbs and mine read 3425lbs..so I'll believe our actual cars vs your book or website..also I know about the MX-6 and I've been under the hood of his car helping him fix it...It's an LX as in NO TURBO..the GT was the only model with turbo...also I posted mileage for a reason...anyone who knows about cars knows that high mileage engines do not maintain their original compression,and lose some horsepower...so I think he's only got me in one dept:torque,and I suspect with 150,000 miles,and an oil leak,he doesnt have me by much...plus his clutch is slipping
Mazda MX6 LX:
Engine: 2.2 Liter
Horsepower: 110
Torque: 130 ft-lbs
Fuel Economy: 24/31 mpg
Bore x Stoke: 3.39 x 3.7
Compression Ratio: 8.6
Curb Weight: 2,615 lbs
0 - 60 mph: 9.2 sec.
And here are the Turbo specs
Engine: 2.2 Liter
Horsepower: 145
Torque: 190 ft-lbs
Fuel Economy: 21/28 mpg
Bore x Stoke: 3.39 x 3.7
Compression Ratio: 7.8
Curb Weight: 2,705 lbs
0 - 60 mph: 7.2 sec.
Last edited by mito7878; June-12th-2002 at 07:36 PM.
#9
really wasnt my point about the weight,but im still lighter,newer,and most definitely a better clutch considering my tranny got replaced 5,000 miles ago...not to mention I already nipped the turbo part in the bud,I've been under the hood of this car and there is no turbo...not to mention the LX MX-6 had NO TURBO...c'mon guys give me a brake here,I want an honest opinion,not to get flamed...I'll race him anyway and let you disbelievers know..
#10
c'mon guys give me a brake here,I want an honest opinion,not to get flamed...I'll race him anyway and let you disbelievers know..
Where are you guys going to race... how far, how fast? Better choose a long race to overcome his low-end torque and take advantage of your engine's better high-end.
-Jerry
#11
Originally posted by macdaddyslomo
also I posted mileage for a reason...anyone who knows about cars knows that high mileage engines do not maintain their original compression,and lose some horsepower...so I think he's only got me in one dept:torque,and I suspect with 150,000 miles,and an oil leak,he doesnt have me by much...plus his clutch is slipping
also I posted mileage for a reason...anyone who knows about cars knows that high mileage engines do not maintain their original compression,and lose some horsepower...so I think he's only got me in one dept:torque,and I suspect with 150,000 miles,and an oil leak,he doesnt have me by much...plus his clutch is slipping